Review of Keevil’s Village Design and Communication options – report available

March
Daffodils on Main Street

At the Keevil Parish Council meeting in March 2018, some residents expressed concerns that the Keevil Village Design Statement is no longer aligned with current Core Policies, and its influence on planning decisions for development within the village is uncertain.

With the support of the (then) Chairman and Councillors, a small project group consisting of Sarah Dow, Rob Kevan, Michael Abraham, Gerry Vaughan, Ian Simpson and Norman Owen formed to conduct a brief review and consider which of the following options might best ensure the preservation, character and environment of Keevil and protect it from the threat of insensitive development:

  1. Confirm how much weight an updated Village Design Statement would hold in planning decisions.
  2. Consider whether a Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan would be a useful option.
  3. Investigate whether a Neighbourhood Plan may be a worthwhile approach for the long term.

A more detailed project outline provided to the Parish Council is here: Proposal for Keevil VDS-NP Project_1.2

May
Summer verges looking to Little Talboys

Final Report Review of Keevil VDS and Planning Communication_May 3rd 2018

A 14-page report documenting the group’s findings and conclusions was delivered to Keevil Parish Council on 3rd May 2018. You can download the full report on the link above.

SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS

The Church Farm planning application in January 2018 exposed several flaws in the way planning matters are communicated to villagers, as well as some vulnerability in the degree to which Keevil’s VDS can protect the village from inappropriate development – though it also showed how the village can rally around an issue.

Most communities considering Local Plans of any kind are mostly concerned about development issues. As a small village, Keevil is not expected to take significant volumes of housing – in fact, no further developments are required to meet current Core Strategy according to the latest data issued by WC up to April 2017.

The aims of Neighbourhood Planning are primarily to decide where and what type of development should happen in a local area and to promote more development than is set out in the Core Strategy. This, together with the time, huge commitment and cost (albeit covered by Grant funding) of producing a Neighbourhood Plan should point us in the direction of updating/renewing the VDS.

In the interim we would like KPC to continue to visibly reference the extant VDS as a guide in their deliberations of planning decisions to support or not any forthcoming planning application.

Therefore we respectfully propose the Parish Council considers the following:

1 The support of a period of Consultation with villagers that:

  • Shares the findings of this report, and discusses views on short, medium and long term needs of the village;
  • Explores preferred channels of communication for planning and other village matters;
2 The support of a new village Project group consisting of, though not necessarily limited to, those involved with this report, with clear Terms of Reference to:

  • Oversee the updating of the VDS in line with current Core Policy and in consultation with the village community;
  • Pursue its adoption as a Supplementary Planning Document;
  • Provide guidance to KPC and the wider village vis-à-vis the development of a Conservation Area Appraisal in the medium term;
  • Support and cross-fertilise with KPC activity in any other scoping activity.
3 We have already written to the KPC Clerk to ask of WC Planning Office: “Can a new or updated Village Design Statement, made in line with the correct Core Policies, be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document?”. We propose the question is also put formally before our elected representative Jonathan Seed, so that the response has to be a matter of public record;
4 We would like to see Planning as a standing item on all KPC Meeting agendas, and recommend the appointment of a Councillor to hold a ‘planning portfolio’.
5 We would like to see the Council’s Standing Orders made public, on the Transparency section of the village website and elsewhere, so it is clear to villagers the terms of reference by which KPC is run, and what they can expect;
6 If it does not have one, we propose KPC develop and publish a clear Communication Strategy and/or a Statement of Community Engagement, in consultation with villagers;

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s